You get factory-overclocked speeds of 1905 MHz GPU Boost. Is a 3dMark problem? Is a specific GPU problem? It matter? I mean should i ignore the 3dMark results because (maybe) in games it make a difference if the GPU is overclocked? I did not measure any results in games, yet. 11,360 152 2 Windows desktop mode is considered 2D.so your GPU will run at its minimum clock speeds on memory and core (minimising power consumption and thus heat). The massive DirectCU III cooler is also practically unchanged and capable of handling much higher thermal loads than what the RTX 2070 Super can put out. Howerver, i found this 2 years old comparasion, what is saying exactly what i notice, that overclocking this GPU dont bring higher results in 3DMark: I searced a lot on internet but did not find too much. Anyone know a fix for this issue Also added a screenshot of whats running. The ROG Strix RTX 3090 OC is priced at 1800. ASUS has also given the RTX 3090 a factory overclock of 1860 MHz, while the memory is left untouched at 19.5 Gbps. Now my confusing is that when i overclock this GPU the 3dMark results go lower for GPU, as you can see: So basically when Im in my desktop, or just idle, the GPUs Clock Speed and Memory goes up for no reason, including the temperature. We did a special round of testing at the maximum power limit in our RTX 3090 STRIX OC review to see what additional performance can be gained.
#Asus 3d clock full#
The GPU get maxim 33 celsius in full load (benchmarks) The memory is rock-stable as XMP 2.0 in bios, 3200 Mhz The proc is rock-stable at 5 Ghz, and stable max 46 celsius in full load Memory: TEAM GROUP EDITION 16GB (2X8GB) DDR4 PC4-25600C14 3200MHZ DUAL CHANNEL KITĬooler: water, custom loop (5 rads x 140) Processor: Intel I7-7700K delided + relided w metal liquid Few days ago i got this GPU, Asus Turbo GTX 1080 Ti 11GB (1481 Mhz core / 1377 Mhz mem) which it works now on this rig:
0 kommentar(er)
